Stefano Vinciguerra
Abstract
An utilitarian vision tyrannizes over our time, until to feed a technicality that exasperates the harmony of the techne and it activates a sort of productivistic activism: that is sure to understand all in facere. “I do to know and I know to produce”, becomes the more common poietic motet. From here the incitement to continuous battles against the philosophy that, only identified with the exercise of the theorèin, is accused of idleness, unproductiveness and uselessness. The objective of this work is not certainly to produce an apology of the philosophical exercise, because our hermeneutic assumption intends it as a sort of human transcendental matter that structures the same Selbst: to talk about the reality and about oneself as its part, to authenticate oneself historically as a spectator and an actor; which human production is more appropriate for the man? We would like to prove whereas that the theoretical thymos, even in its metaphysical rush and not only in the reverberations of the moral reflection that leads to the eupraxia, had repercussions, more or less openly, in the praxis with relapse into the everyday life, category meant as an existential concrete a priori structure. Demonstrating then that the dialectic of theorèin and praxis, associated ontologically with the everyday life and with the ended subjectivity, allows a route among ideality and concreteness that can not lead to suggestions of the surrealisms, to the simple enthusiasm aroused by the magic realisms or to the blinding shines caused by the utopias: so a path that, with figured language, we call oasis.
References
